Good enough for him.

was it a stupid foul?

Stamping the player on the ground

Why bother stamping?

let's see if the boks can score twice

Liability, should have gone for retaliation last week

Typical Hartley

Another citing coming for him.

Ya can always count on him to make a balls of it delighted!!!

He taps the boks players knee to say put it down or move it three times then stamps on it he would get a warning not a yellow he gave the bok player fair warning to move his knee

Loser

He will get dealt with when he comes back on hehe

Sorry Ben Wright have you been watching the game? that was a blatant yellow

Why bother stamping?! Question should be why bother playing him at all. Most inconsistent and indisciplined hooker English rugby has ever had!!

What a ****

Agreed

Isn't it about time he was permanently dropped. Good news he is off to Europe

Ben you are up there with deluded English fans

"But ref I told him I was going to stamp on him if he didn't move"

That wasn't a stamp. My daughter stamps harder than that

Yes Jonah I am watching agreed it was a stupid decision and a blatant foul I was complaining that the yellow was a bit harsh a penalty and a last warning would have sufficed

Could be a red

Definitely a yellow card especially after seeing the new Zealand player getting one last week for kicking out.

NOT a yellow. If you're lying in the way you're going to get trodden on. This is Rugby! Jesus.

Defo not a yellow, SA player on the floor making no attempt to get out the way, Hartley tapped him twice then went for the stamp, warning at most

You see players get trodden on all the time, at least he gave him a tap to warn of it, which in itself is rarely seen

Ha ha. Love the comments. It was clearly a yellow. Done with intent to harm the best player in the world THORMeulen. Suck it you wining Poms!

English fans please understand that even if you give a player prior warning that you're going to stamp on them it doesn't mean it is ok to stamp on then... Honestly!

@Alan Macdonald - "best player in the world"? Really? No. You're very wrong.